COOLER MASTER HYPER 212 EVO REVIEW 2016 FULL
There is also a slightly lower thermal signature in the adjacent regions at full speed, which indicates the added benefit of improved airflow.Ĭonsidering the low noise levels of the Hyper 212 Evo v2 even at full speed, having a quality fan curve which favors higher fan RPM is beneficial for any system installation. Our Flir One Pro thermal imaging camera shows some noticeable differences in heat soak throughout the cooling tower itself between 50% and 100%, which is to be expected.
Omitting AVX instruction sets allows for accurate, 100% loads at chosen clock speeds, while allowing AVX instructions would provide higher, albeit, unrealistic synthetic CPU loads and excessive heat production, less indicative of real-world use. Prime95 v29.4b8 (no AVX) is used for two-hour intervals, one managing fans at 50% PWM and the other at 100% PWM with RPM measurements being taken every three seconds and averaged across the duration of each two-hour capture. 7C70v12)Ĭorsair Dominator Platinum RGB, 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3600ĬrystalFontz CFA-633-TMI-KU, 4x Dallas One Wire WR-DOW-Y17 sensorsĬorsair Commander Pro, 100%/50% PWM Speed profiles (liquid cooling pump always if applicable)ĭata comparisons are based on data collected from testing performed on our new Intel i9-10850K system, including re-visiting many previously covered products which were originally covered on the prior testing platform which pivoted around an i7-5930k (4.20ghz Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO V2 at Amazon for $39.99 Intel Core i9-10850K LGA1200 (Comet Lake), all 10 cores 4.6Ghz 1.190v, (3.60Ghz stock speed, single core boost 5.2Ghz)
0 kommentar(er)
